Skal

 

Genre: Post-Apocalyptic Comedy / Thriller
Director: Benjamin Cappelletti
Starring: Evan Marsh (Arthur), Olivia Scriven, Trevor Hayes, Darren Eisnor, Mariah Inger 
Runtime: ~74 min

Skal: Fight for Survival - Apple TV

Arthur, a cocky influencer celebrating 3 million YouTube subscribers, is hosting a lavish party when a sudden apocalypse—marked by global water disappearance—derails everything. As water becomes the world’s most precious resource, Arthur must fight for survival alongside a ragtag group including a cop and housemates.

✔️ Timely Satire of Influencer Culture
The film intentionally pokes fun at social-media narcissism. Arthur’s constant self-filming and smug demeanor reflect modern online culture—a satirical backdrop to the survival storyline.

✔️ Occasional Visual Highlights
Some scenes—like a dust-enveloped Manhattan after the water vanishes—offer striking imagery. These visual moments provide brief glimpses of cinematic promise.

 

❌ Unlikable Protagonist
Arthur is widely considered insufferable. Critics noted he's “smug, egocentric and punchable,” with little character growth until the finale.

❌ Tonal Inconsistency
The film fluctuates unpredictably between teen drama, apocalyptic thriller, and meta-comedy. This uneven tone undercuts tension and leaves the audience unsure whether to laugh or feel suspense.

❌ Derivative Structure
Skal largely follows familiar end‑of‑the‑world tropes—crash, regroup, resource scramble—without adding fresh twists. A self-aware script-meets-film reveal further weakens dramatic stakes.

❌ Critical Reception
With an IMDb score of just 2.2/10 and scathing reviews (“prime example… made just to annoy anyone unfortunate enough to watch” — 2.4/10 on Letterboxd), it’s clear Skal failed to resonate broadly.

 

Skal: Fight for Survival tries to blend influencer satire with apocalyptic drama, but its execution undermines its ambition. The protagonist’s narcissism isn’t counterbalanced by compelling growth, and the tone jumps make it feel unfocused. Occasionally striking visuals are overshadowed by cringe-inducing dialogue and stale plot mechanics.

Rating: ⭐️⭐️☆☆☆ (2/5)

Who Might Enjoy It: Fans of B-movie vanity satires or those curious about low-budget apocalyptic experiments.
Who Should Skip It: Viewers seeking cohesive narrative, memorable characters, or polished storytelling.